Mistra’s carbon footprint in 2020

Sustainability analysis of our investments is based largely on dialogue with our asset managers. To compile documentation for this dialogue, we use various tools. One is the carbon footprint described here.

    Through its activities, Mistra aims to contribute to society’s sustainable development. A key part of this endeavour is to work proactively, as an institutional asset owner and investor, for a sustainable financial market. Sustainability analysis of our investments is based largely on dialogue with our asset managers. To compile documentation for this dialogue, we use a range of tools, including the carbon footprint presented here.

    A carbon footprint can be estimated for a company, product or investment, for example. It is a way of presenting the implications of the total greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions associated with the business, product or investment concerned. To describe this, emissions related to production and the supply chain, use and waste management should be included. The estimate should, in other words, be based on a life-cycle approach. For this to be feasible, data must be available and relevant limits set.

    For Mistra, obtaining an estimate of the carbon footprint of our investments and equity portfolio is valuable since the results can serve as data support for dialogue with asset managers and companies. We also perceive value in supporting development of methodology and a process whereby the financial sector includes climate and other sustainability aspects in its discussions and decision-making. Requiring emission data can also promote greater data availability. Mistra has therefore signed the Montréal Pledge (www.montrealpledge.org), an international initiative to support development and implementation of efforts to monitor GHG emissions associated with capital investments.

    Nonetheless, Mistra is well aware of the limitations of a carbon footprint. As it is often estimated today, a carbon footprint of an investment or portfolio is not sufficiently informative about its climate impact. Some reasons for this are as follows:

    • Rather than being forward-looking, the method focuses on historical emissions.
    • Neither emissions in companies’ supply chains nor emissions from products and services are normally included.
    • The impact of sector selection, rather than com­panies’ actual climate performance, may dominate an analysis of a portfolio’s carbon footprint.
    • Biogenic emissions are equated with those from fossil fuels.
    • Data reporting is incomplete.

    Mistra’s carbon footprint in 2020

    For 2020, assisted by the analyst company MSCI, Mistra had the carbon footprint measured both for its entire equity portfolio and for individual equity funds. The figures are estimated on the basis of Mistra’s ownership interest in each company through investment in the equity fund concerned. This analysis includes data on direct GHG emissions and indirect emissions from elect­ricity use. Emissions from the remainder of the value chain, use of manufactured products and their disposal as waste are not included. GHG emissions are presented as ‘carbon dioxide equivalents’ (tCO2e). These estimates may include biogenic CO2 emissions, depending on the reporting of companies.

    The carbon footprint of Mistra’s equity portfolio at 30 September 2020 was 8,000 tonnes of tCO2e. In terms of the propor­tions of the companies’ turnover to which Mistra’s ownership interests correspond, the portfolio’s carbon footprint represents a carbon intensity of 11.3 tCO2e per SEK million of turnover, while in relation to investment value the figure is 5.1 tCO2e per SEK million invested. By comparison, it may be mentioned that the carbon footprint of the Fourth Swedish National Pension Fund (AP Fund) in relation to turnover for 2019 was 13.5 tCO2e per SEK million of turnover.[1]

    In the dialogue with fund managers, information from the analysis will serve as a basis for discussing, in particular, how companies that do not report GHG emissions can be induced to do so. Discussions will also focus on companies defined in MSCI’s analysis as ‘laggards’ when it comes to risk management associated with GHG emissions. Compared to previous years, Mistra’s carbon footprint has increased. Companies that contribute the most to this increase will be highlighted in discussions with fund managers.

    Mistra’s carbon footprint, 2018–20

    Carbon footprint 30 September 2020 30 September 2019 30 September 2018
     Mistra / MSCI Index Index MSCI ACWI ESG Universal  Mistra / MSCI Index Index MSCI ACWI ESG Universal Mistra / MSCI Index Index MSCI ACWI ESG Universal
    tCO2e 8 000 17 000 18 000 3 900 18 000 19 000 5 100 23 000 25 000
    tCO2e/MSEK turnover 11.3 19 21 4.9 18 22 5.2 20 22
    tCO2e/MSEK investment 5.1 11 12 2.4 11 12 3.0 13 15

     

    The carbon footprint of the equity portfolio was compared with the weighted benchmark index used for the financial trend of the portfolio (SIXPRX/MSCI ACWI), and with an ESG[2] index (Index MSCI ACWI ESG Universal[3]).

    The equity portfolio analysed had a market value of SEK 1,565 million, excluding liquid assets in the funds, corresponding to 48 per cent of Mistra’s aggregate investments (2018: SEK 1,645 million, 49 per cent).

    [1] https://www.ap4.se/en/esg/climate-and-the-environment—a-focus-area/.

    [2] Environmental, Social and Governance.

    [3] https://www.msci.com/documents/10199/0ca6fd46-3b5e-410e-bbde-e3bdbea88ef3.

    Click here for Mistra’s toolbox.